In my last post, I began analyzing Dave Malouf’s article, Thoughts on code, programming, design, production, development, technology and Oh! Design. I started to write the post that would have followed on Thursday, but I had to prepare a haunted house to open Friday night and just couldn’t finish it.
Continuing where I left off, Dave Malouf gives us a dose of reality.
So for all intents and purposes, the point is just plain moot. Because as Jr. and Mid-level designers become Sr. and director level designers, their tech chops will just be assumed as they move up the ladder. Our whole frame of reference will be completely changed (is changing) in the next 3-5 years.
But what of more experienced designers? Are we grandfathered in? Do we get a free ride, delegating the implementation to the junior staff? Even Dave admits he lost out on positions because he couldn’t code at an appropriate level. I have always been one to teach myself new software and new technologies when I needed them to accomplish something. I taught myself to edit video in Premiere, create 3-D animations in Infini-D, and create interactive multimedia in Director in the course of a year while I was a senior in college. I experimented with numerous software packages for animation and web design in grad school. I had less opportunity to do this after becoming employed, but I’ve kept my HTML and CSS skills up-to-date and taught myself enough jQuery to use it on a project. I’m confident enough in my prototyping and implementation skills that I’m not concerned about a hotshot designer fresh out of school beating me out of a position.
Dave believes that designers must sacrifice depth in UX practice to add breadth in visual design and coding. If you’ve been following along, you already know that this is one point on which Dave and I don’t see eye-to-eye. As I’ve mentioned before, UX practitioners should develop some amount of depth in their specialty before putting the crossbar on their T, but a career is a long time. I’m not going to claim I know everything there is to know about Interaction Design, but I certainly know enough to branch out into some other areas.
That covers what Dave sees as the problems. Tomorrow, I’ll take a look at the good side.