Googgles
Two weeks ago, Google posted their visionary video introducing Project Glass, a head-worn display (HWD) for your phone. At least, I assume it is “for your phone”, rather than “as your phone”, mainly due to the fact that, in the near future, they won’t be able to fit the components into that small and light a form factor. None of the articles I’ve read have given details of the technology, but I’m assuming the device communicates via Bluetooth with an Android phone.
Some have questioned the technical feasibility. I have no doubts about this. I was working with wearable computers and HWDs back in 1999. The wearable group in CMU’s Robotics Institute had an impressively small and powerful wearable named Spot that I designed some software for. We were using a prototype HWD from IBM that was only a little bulkier than the Google prototype.

Not quite as stylish as Google’s glasses, I know, but it was state-of-the art in 2002. It was the equivalent of viewing an 800 x 600 pixel, 15 inch, VGA display at 12 inches. So, ten years later, I have no doubt that it is possible to produce something similar to what is shown in Google’s video.
However, I have to agree with Mark Wilson’s article for Fast Company. The technical hurdles are the smallest ones. Wearables were a very popular area of research at institutions such as MIT, CMU, and Georgia Tech. There were several companies, like Xybernaut, that tried to make a go at commercializing them. They all failed. It’s reminiscent (if worse) of the tablet market prior to the iPad, and it seems Google wants to pull an Apple. Is it possible to do for wearables what Apple did for tablets?
One thing Google has going for them is that we are already wearing the CPU. We all carry a phone in our pocket or purse that has far more processing power than Spot, as well as multiple wireless communication antennas and contextual sensors. Another advantage is that speech input is finally becoming an acceptable method of interaction. Back in the day, we were dealing with novel input devices: dials, joysticks, and chording keypads like the Twiddler. These were interesting experiments, but they were barriers to adoption.

So it all comes down to fashion. Yes, there’s that word again. What will it take to make HWDs not just socially acceptable, but fashionable? We don’t want to look anything like Steve Mann from the ’90s. I’ve seen many men walking around with Bluetooth ear pieces, but let’s be honest—nobody thinks that’s cool. Google’s hardware is more attractive than any other headgear I’ve seen, but is it sexy? Could it accrue the same social currency as Apple’s white earbuds? It’s possible, but I wouldn’t count on it.